Back to Top

Craniology isn't Craniometry But Phrenology

Craniology is the study of the distinctions in extent, size, and state of the noggin, or skull. Likewise called phrenology, it has its underlying foundations in the eighteenth century, when individuals trusted that the character of a man could be uncovered by the state of his or her skull. Craniology was once viewed as an essential practice in human sciences considers.

Craniometry is the scientific measurement of the skull

Created by Franz Joseph Bother, a German doctor, craniology depends on the fact that the cerebrum itself is an organ of the psyche. Amid this day and age, it was a typical conviction that the diverse mental capacities of an individual were held in discrete, methodical nooks inside the cerebral cortex. The cosmetics of a man's skull was said to demonstrate the span of every personnel, and subsequently the amount of a specific characteristic that individual had. A craniologist would painstakingly analyze a skull, distinguishing different discouragements and knocks, and give an analysis of that individual's identity.

Today craniology is thought to be a pseudoscience. In spite of the fact that craniologists may guarantee that it is a logical practice, it doesn't really submit to satisfactory models of logical procedure. A few researchers even expelled the review as a pseudoscience upon its beginning. Be that as it may, that did not keep it from being utilized as a part of numerous psychiatry and neuroscience speculations and practices.


Anthropological practices that represented considerable authority in examining elements of the head with a specific end goal to make identity expectations are not constrained to craniology. Craniometry includes measuring the bones in the skull, while physiognomy is the investigation of facial components. Each of these orders claim to have the capacity to foresee attributes or insight through their reviews. These practices are likewise generally expelled as deception by present day researchers.

These fields were for the most part used in physical humanities amid the nineteenth and twentieth hundreds of years. Their utilization was intensely political, giving support to race isolation in light of the diverse cranial cosmetics of every race. Georges Vacher de Lapouge, an unmistakable French anthopologist, was especially for such racialism. He made a progressive system of mankind, wanting to ingrain a settled social request.

Taking after its utilization by racial oppressors in the mid twentieth century, numerous researchers approached with counter proof to invalidate these ideas. The utilization of such hypotheses to make racial division is viewed as both untrustworthy and informal. Present day researchers and antiquarians both keep on studying craniology and its related reviews as a preventative update what sort of impacts the abuse of science can bring about.

Source: Wise Geek
Image via: Wikimedia

No comments:

We ❤ comment(s) but don't spam us.